It appears the surveys, media and political pundits got it wrong . . .
and for good reason. The most improbable
candidate, who spat on political correctness, who had to win all the states a
Republican must win plus some Democratic states, where everything had to go
exactly right and then something more – actually won.
We must further recognize the terribly flawed candidate of Hillary
Clinton. Mired in lies, corruption, and
investigated for criminal behavior, she just could not excite liberal, urban,
minority, and millennial voters as an agent of change. Unenthused by Clinton, this election was to
her base as 2012 was to Mitt Romney when his conservative base of voters stayed
home because they were unenthused with him.
Clinton (nor Trump) had the confidence of voters, who when surveyed, a
majority viewed unfavorably. Trump won
the election as much as Clinton lost it.
However, this belies the underpinnings of what lead to Trump’s
election. First, President Barack Obama
declared his policies and legacy were on the ballot – and they were and all
were rejected. Second, the nation voted
to obliterate the past 16 years of government’s unrestrained growth that
correlated with the nation’s crippled economic growth, unnerving deficits,
uncontrolled debt, unsustainable entitlements, and dysfunctional foreign
policy. Third, the media was repudiated
for untrustworthy and bias reporting.
Fourth, and not to be understated, was the suffocation of political
correctness and its assault on speech, religion, and family. PC revulsion created a new class of “dark
voters” who would not participate in surveys or gave false answers for fear of
reprisals for being politically incorrect.
These “dark voters” were invisible to the mountain of polling done and
made these surveys irrelevant.
As such, does Donald Trump’s election bring hope to America? At this point there is no way to tell, but it
does send a message to parties, politicians, and media that they are all in ill
repute. D.C., to quote from Obi-Wan
Kenobi, is a “wretched hive of scum and villainy.” The feasting on and redistribution of income
by government done at the expense of tax payers has reached a crescendo. Voters expressed their dissatisfaction with
excesses, lack of accountability, agencies that target groups and business out
of political favor, special interests, and party politics that are put before
the good of the nation.
Democrats and Republicans beware, as both parties are in the cross-hairs
of voter wrath. Democratic PC dogma to
brand folk who do not agree with them as science deniers, homophobes, sexists,
racists, or simply the “deplorables” got Democrats kicked-out of local and
national offices. Republicans crow they
won the Electoral College, but fail to mention they lost the popular vote –
again. And both parties that rushed to
“identity politics” were blind to voters who simply saw themselves as
individual Americans.
Parties failed to realize that a large measure of middle-income voters do
not see government as the solution to their economic malaise, but see government
policies as the cause of it. Good
politics should be about good policy that is reached through compromise. Free people and free markets, more than
government, are the answer. Republicans
need to accommodate some liberal items to govern. Democrats need to accommodate conservative
policies because Republicans have been given a majority by the voters. Parties must not be captive to the vocal few
but serve a wider audience.
*****
This election had the two most unfavorable candidates. More people voted against a candidate than
they did for a candidate. However, this
distain may have a silver lining as expressed by one disgusted voter about the
choices he had: “Next time I’ll pay more attention!”
In Trump we really have no idea how he will govern or if he can at
all. He is not really a Republican,
Democrat, conservative, or liberal. Heck,
he is not even a politician. We cannot
tell if any of the statements he made during the election process are real or
illusory.
We wish Mr. Trump well as he goes to Washington with the hope he can bring better policy and compromise. That he will see people individually instead of by identity. He will get only one shot at this. He can, if he chooses, transcend parties and become an historic figure, he could fail into divisiveness, or simply fade into history as the most improbable candidate that got elected...but nothing more.
No comments:
Post a Comment