Free healthcare, free welfare, free social security – these are the
cornerstone of the entitlement state, ergo, the word entitlement. Something you get because of a classification
government has proscribed to you – sick, poor or retired.
We asked a woman that supported the Affordable Care Act, who covers the
cost of the ACA? She paused, thought a
moment, then simply said – I don’t know.
Then it was suggested the government was paying and, in a sigh of
relief, she responded affirmatively. But
in the next breath, she was asked where was the government getting its
money? Puzzlement again swept through
her.
The point is that all these “free” programs have to be paid for from
private taxpayers as – and here is the revelation for some – the government has
no money of its own, only that which it taxes from the people and that which it
borrows (that also must be paid back by taxing the people). So, as we write in Vigilance The Price of
Liberty, politicians have developed a pay-off scheme to take from some to
give to others, with the government comfortably in the middle to take its
cut. Ergo, nothing is free.
More immoral, is the inevitability of political corruption. What could be done for a dollar in the
private sector takes a figurative $10 of waste and fraud in the public
sector. This is immoral because the
government coercively takes money from taxpayers to redistribute to tax takers
without regard for efficiency or efficacy.
But what of the mantra that society has a responsibility to care for the
poor? That the problem of the poor is
too large for charity alone. That there
is a social injustice when some have too much and others have too little. Thomas Sowell in his book, Wealth, Poverty
and Politics, quotes the economist Henry Hazlitt who wrote of poverty: “The real problem of poverty is not a problem
of “distribution” but of production. The
poor are poor not because something is being withheld from them but because,
for whatever reason, they are not producing enough.”
#bevigilantbefree